New York Times alleges Microsoft built supercomputer to aid OpenAI copyright infringement
Ars Technica|Written by: ์ดํ๋ฏผ|Jun 28, 2026|Updated Jun 29, 2026|2 views|
★★★★☆
The New York Times has moved to amend its copyright lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging Microsoft actively encouraged infringement by building a powerful supercomputing system for OpenAI. This amendment seeks to align its contributory infringement claim with a new legal standard set by a recent Supreme Court ruling.
The New York Times has filed a motion to amend its copyright complaint against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging that Microsoft actively encouraged OpenAI to infringe upon the newspaper's works. In a heavily redacted court filing on Thursday, the NYT claimed Microsoft facilitated this infringement by constructing a bespoke supercomputing system for OpenAI, which it described as among the most powerful in the world. A spokesperson for the NYT, Graham James, stated that the request to file an amended complaint aims to strengthen their case and clarify the contributory infringement claim against Microsoft, citing new legal developments and evidence uncovered during discovery.
This move by the NYT follows a recent Supreme Court decision that sided with Cox Communications in a case where Sony unsuccessfully attempted to hold Cox liable for music piracy as an Internet service provider. That ruling established a new standard for contributory infringement, requiring plaintiffs to demonstrate that parties intentionally acted to induce illegal conduct. Recognizing this shift in legal precedent, the NYT is now seeking to revise its complaint to ensure its claim against Microsoft aligns with this updated standard, emphasizing Microsoft's alleged active role in the infringement.
The outcome of this amended lawsuit could set a significant precedent for the responsibilities of technology companies that provide foundational infrastructure for AI development. It raises critical questions about the extent to which a provider of computing resources can be held liable for the copyright practices of its users. For the broader AI industry, this could influence how AI models are trained, potentially leading to stricter vetting of training data sources or the development of new licensing models. Policymakers may also face increased pressure to establish clearer guidelines regarding AI and intellectual property rights.
โ AIDEN Editorial Team ยท Reviewed by ์ดํ๋ฏผ
What this means for the market
This development introduces a new dimension to the ongoing debate about AI training data and copyright liability. It suggests that providers of foundational infrastructure, like supercomputing resources, could face legal scrutiny for their role in AI development. Such a precedent might compel AI developers and their partners to more rigorously assess the provenance and licensing of data used for model training. This could lead to shifts in investment towards ethically sourced datasets and impact the collaborative models between AI startups and major tech companies.
How this issue is unfolding
The issue of copyright infringement concerning data used for AI model training has emerged as a globally significant concern alongside the advancement of AI technology. The lawsuit between The New York Times and OpenAI/Microsoft is central to this debate, demanding a legal interpretation of the scope of using existing copyrighted works and the principles of fair use in AI development. Specifically, whether the contributions of large technology companies like Microsoft to AI development can be considered 'contributory' to copyright infringement is expected to profoundly impact the future business models and technological development directions of the AI industry. This lawsuit is a crucial part of the process to find a balance between copyright protection and technological innovation in the age of AI.